Sir, – I certainly strongly support Una Mullally’s appeal to plant more deciduous trees rather than monoculture sitka (“Sitka spruce dominates Irish ‘forests’ – this is both wrong and dangerous”, Opinion & Analysis, July 25th).
Given climate change and the fairly limited number of native species, I feel that there is a need to include in such a programme non-native species such as sweet chestnut, which will thrive in hotter temperatures, as well as species such as beech and lime, with a proven ability to thrive in our climate.
Heavy reliance on any one species is dangerous. Dutch elm disease and ash dieback have severely impacted the Irish countryside and should force us to concentrate on maximising biodiversity. – Yours, etc,
JULIAN
The 100 best Irish books of the 21st century: No 100 to No 51
Gerry Thornley: Jack Crowley’s patience rewarded as Ireland go in search of Rome revival against Italy
An Irish Diary on memorable gigs from John Denver in the RDS to Bruce Springsteen in Slane
Catherine Fulvio’s St Patrick’s Way review: Glorified advertorial is a blizzard of bland. It’s a disservice to the celebrity chef
GAISFORD-ST LAWRENCE,
Coil Dubh,
Co Kildare.
Sir, – What was the purpose in putting quote marks around the word “forests” in Una Mullally’s recent article and its accompanying online headline? A forest, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, is a “large area of land that is thickly covered by trees”, irrespective of whether those trees are “native”, “naturalised”, naturally regenerated or strategically planted. – Yours, etc,
MIA GALLAGHER,
Inchicore,
Dublin 8.
