Lizzie Armitstead’s Olympic reprieve has raised the eyebrows of other athletes after the Court of Arbitration for Sport ruled that the British cyclist was free to compete in Rio.
Armitstead had faced the prospect of a two-year ban, and missing out on taking part in the women’s road race this weekend, after revealing on Monday night she had incurred three violations pertaining to her whereabouts for drugs tests.
The 27-year-old subsequently appealed to CAS successfully, but other athletes have questioned the circumstances surrounding Armitstead’s situation.
Former British Olympic rowing gold medallist Zac Purchase posted on Twitter: “Given huge amount of resources their disposal, having multiple missed tests/filing failure is a monumental cockup!
“Imagine what we would be saying if she was Russian... #NotWorthIt #KeepSportClean.”
Canadian three-time former Olympian cross-country mountain biker Geoff Kabush added: "1st test understandable but I'd be hyper aware about missing 2nd. If I missed 2nd there is no chance I'd miss 3rd???
“So many questions. How is World Champ suspended for 3 weeks and no one knows? Why did British Cycling fund appeal?”
Armitstead was Britain’s first medallist of London 2012 four years ago with silver in the road race on The Mall and is one of the favourites for the same event in Rio on Sunday.
The CAS ruled in favour of her appeal after finding UK Anti-doping’s doping control officer had failed to follow procedure and her August 2015 missed test was declared void.
Athletes must make themselves available for testing for one hour each day and inform testers of their location.
Armitstead has two further missed tests on her record and a further absence would lead to a rule violation and sanction.
Armitstead was charged by UKAD with three whereabouts failures on July 11, leading to a suspension pending disciplinary action.
The first came at a World Cup event in Sweden on August 20th, 2015.
The second was an administrative failure on October 5th, 2015 and the third was a missed test on June 9th, 2016 following “an emergency change of plans due to a serious illness within her family”.
Armitstead did not dispute the second two faults, but successfully appealed to CAS over the first missed test.
“CAS ruled that the UKAD doping control officer had not followed required procedures nor made reasonable attempts to locate Armitstead,” a statement on behalf of Armitstead read.
“CAS also ruled that there was no negligence on Armitstead’s part and that she had followed procedures according to the guidelines.”
Armitstead was tested a day after the first missed test, following the race in Sweden.
Earlier on Monday Armitstead was cagey when questioned on her absence from recent races. She was a late withdrawal from La Course by Le Tour, the women's race which took place on July 24th, when the Tour de France concluded in Paris.
She expressed relief at the CAS’s finding.
“I have always been and will always be a clean athlete and have been vocal in my anti-doping stance throughout my career,” she said.
“I am pleased that CAS has accepted my position, having provided detailed information demonstrating the situation around my strikes.”
UKAD did not address Armitstead’s case or criticisms directly.
A UKAD spokeswoman said: “We recognise that mistakes do happen and plans can change at short notice, which is why an athlete can accrue a combination of three missed tests or filing failures in 12 months under the World Anti-Doping Code.
“But athletes have a responsibility to ensure they support and follow the system, or they risk a possible two-year ban.”
Christine Ohuruogu, the 2008 Olympic 400 metres champion, was banned for a year following three missed tests in 2006.
