Sir, – Dave Alvey (Letters, October 19th) asks why legal experts consider the action taken by President Michael D Higgins regarding the Planning Bill to be “very unusual” (“‘Very unusual’ for President to suggest concerns around Planning Bill without referring it to Supreme Court”, News, October 17th).
If the President considered the Bill to be unconstitutional, he should have referred it to the Supreme Court. That’s his job, as Roy Keane might point out.
If not, then he should have reined in his ego a bit and refrained from issuing a commentary on the matter.
Mr Higgins is not a legal expert, yet he appears to relish the limelight on this matter, and on so many others. – Yours, etc,
READ MORE
How will the State support families in the budget?
The Bear review: The restaurant needs a recipe for success if it is to survive, both on screen and in reality
Iron Maiden in Dublin: All killer(s) no filler in a near perfect set list that hits the high notes every time
Why have oil prices not soared in wake of Israel and US bombing Iran?
MATTHEW GLOVER,
Lucan,
Co Dublin.
