Recordings suggest electoral fraud in Afghan presidential election

Afghanistan’s leadership crisis has deepened after one presidential candidate released audio recordings that he said captured a senior election official conspiring to commit large-scale fraud using the code word “stuffed sheep” to discuss illegally filled ballot boxes.

In 15 minutes of sometimes slightly surreal conversation, two men urge an official to fire election staff with suspect loyalties and replace them with known supporters, ramp up plans for vote buying and ballot stuffing, and close down polling stations in areas thought to be unsympathetic.

“Take the sheep into the mountain and bring them back stuffed,” one man says, before apparently lamenting the growing cost of buying votes. “The price of goats and sheep has gone up these days,” he says ruefully.

A campaign manager for former mujahideen doctor Abdullah Abdullah yesterday said one speaker in that conversation was a close aide of the country's chief electoral officer, Ziaulhaq Amarkhil, although he refused to reveal the source of the recordings or offer any verification of the speakers' identity.

He claimed the other man was from the campaign team of Ashraf Ghani, a former World Bank technocrat and author of the book Fixing Failed States. Mr Ghani appears to have a majority of votes in the June 14th run-off against Mr Abdullah but is accused by his rival of cheating.

A two-stage vote that was initially hailed as a triumph for the Afghan people and their fledging democracy, after Taliban threats failed to deter millions from turning out to cast their ballots, has since descended into a tense standoff with no clear path to a resolution.

Mr Abdullah announced last week he was withdrawing from the election process, accusing incumbent Hamid Karzai and Mr Amarkhil of helping Mr Ghani rig the vote, with assistance from government and election officials around the country.

He called for United Nations mediation, an offer unexpectedly endorsed by President Karzai himself, even though the president had spent years squeezing all traces of foreign influence out of the electoral system. The UN itself has been more circumspect.

“This is a process which we respect as an Afghan-led process, Afghan-managed process and we would not want to take steps which would be seen as interfering or substituting the UN for Afghan leadership,” deputy UN envoy Nicholas Haysom told journalists on Saturday.

“The task ahead of us is to have the candidates re-engage fully in the electoral process ... There is no other way of electing a legitimate leader.”

– (Guardian service)