This is an edited comment from one Saudi newspaper yesterday, Dar al Hayat. Under the headline "Terror For Terror" this is what the newspaper had to say:
With the new terrorist strike in Riyadh, the random face of the planners and the perpetrators becomes clear. When sabotage becomes just sabotage. When killing becomes just killing. The project presented becomes just terror for terror, not for any other purpose.
Anyway there is no longer any interest for the "excuses", for they could not impose their logic and became irrelevant. Thus, they prevented all from a conflict that was initially born with no meaning. Terror transcended reality to become a plan for permanent and general chaos that could not receive any understanding from the society, for this latter aims for stability, while chaos does not only threaten stability but wipes the ambitions for reform and development as well.
What did the terrorists gain from killing members of one Lebanese and one Egyptian family, disregarding whether they were a target or not? They started to target safe people in their homes. In the name of what do they kill? There is no longer a religion or beliefs or concepts to be present for justification. This is pure crime, with no politics or demands or objectives looking for the security of the nation and its aim for a good life. Thus, it only expresses desperation and failure. This escape forward keeps on seeming of a high price concerning the human lives and the financial and moral losses.
This is war on terror with its worst, darkest and most delicate periods. During this current stage, it seems to be highlighting the mistakes the Americans made in the random and hasty planning of their war on terror. They had premature thoughts and erroneous analysis they used for the sake of aims that eventually started to threaten with repercussions. They only care for their own interests; however, they acted in a way to put these interests in a permanent confusion. They did not realise that these interests can only be safe in a suitable environment, and they wouldn't be secure unless the Americans carefully participated in implementing the stability of the people and the societies. Thus, the best thing to do is to follow reasonable and wise policies, policies that respect the peace of these societies, and not vengeance policies creating chaos and provoking minds and feelings.
You can read more from Dar al Hayat by going to http://english.daralhayat.com/