UL under pressure to investigate expense claims

The University of Limerick is facing pressure to launch an independent investigation into a series of allegations relating to financial irregularities and human resources practices.

An independent review commissioned by the Higher Education Authority (HEA) confirmed earlier this year that some staff at UL had filed irregular expense claims, including mileage payments for trips between home and the college.

However, the review found all inappropriate claims were challenged and, ultimately, none were issued.

A series of additional allegations relating to human resources practices were made to the independent review by Mazars which have also been brought to the attention of education authorities.

A least a dozen allegations are understood to relate to staff who are still employed, former staff members and at least one former student. Informed sources say the university and the HEA have been in discussion over recent weeks over an investigation into these and other outstanding issues.

If there is not a resolution, one potential avenue is for the Government to appoint an independent investigator. This "visitor" is designated under the act as a sitting or retired High or Supreme Court judge.

Established policies

In a statement to The Irish Times, the university said it treats all allegations seriously and investigates them fully, with such investigations being conducted independently where required and in accordance with established policies and procedures.

The Mazars review was prompted by three individuals in the college’s finance department who raised concerns over expense claims and the actions of senior managers after they highlighted their concerns. One of the whistleblowers – Leonie O’Callaghan – left in 2012 with a financial package after a period of sick leave.

Two other women are technically still employees, according to UL, but have been suspended on full pay as a result of a “separate but active disciplinary process”.

While the Mazars review found no financial mismanagement or financial wrongdoing, the HEA said it was not happy with a series of HR issues raised in the report.

They included weaknesses identified, and acknowledged by the university, in areas including sabbatical expenses, procurement of equipment, travel and subsistence.

It also expressed concern at failures in the management approach to, and application of, HR policies around management of staff absences and the processes relating to return to work of staff on sick leave.

UL said it co-operated fully with the Mazars review and welcomed the recommendations regarding further improvements in its procedures.