No verdict in case of man accused of raping wife on Christmas day

Accused denied telling woman ‘I’ve been waiting to do this for a long time’

The jury in the trial of a man accused of raping his wife on Christmas Day in 2003 has failed to reach a verdict.

The 44-year-old Dublin man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, had pleaded not guilty at the Central Criminal Court to two counts of rape, one count of oral rape and one count of anal rape of his then-wife.

The trial heard the man allegedly raped the woman on the couch after putting their young children to bed on Christmas night.

Mr Justice Patrick McCarthy discharged the jury after they failed to reach a decision upon which at least 10 of them could agree.

READ MORE

They had been deliberating for more than four hours when the foreman told the judge “they had exhausted all options”.

Earlier in the trial, the man took the stand and told Patrick Gageby SC, defending, that he had consensual sex with his wife that night. He said they had both had several drinks and were both drunk.

He said when he came downstairs after putting the children to bed, his wife was lying on the couch. He told the court they started “kissing and fondling”.

He said he sought to have oral sex but the woman said no and they had vaginal sex instead. When asked if he had anal sex with her, the man replied, “Not that I was aware of”.

He said the following morning, his wife was cooking breakfast and she said to him, “Do you know what you did last night?”

“She then proceeded to tell me that I raped her,” the man told the court.

‘Pure shock’

“There was no massive argument. I just went into pure shock I think.”

The man eventually left the marital home, returned for some time and left again. The trial has heard varying accounts as to when exactly that happened. The couple legally separated in 2007.

The man said that he had sexual relations with his wife on a number of occasions after the alleged rape. He said when he returned to the family home, he eventually moved back into the marital bed before his wife packed his bags and he left again.

Prosecution barrister John O’Kelly SC said the man’s assertion that he moved back into the marital bed was a “very recent invention” and “untrue”.

The man denied this was the case.

Mr O’Kelly put it to the man that on Christmas Day 2003, he raped his wife and told her, “I’ve been waiting to do this for a long time” before anally raping her. He submitted that the man had also told her, “You’re my wife”.

“Those words sum up what your intent of having sex with (your wife) on this night was,” Mr O’Kelly said.

“No,” the man replied, adding they were a married couple having “marital intercourse”.