Abuse campaigner criticises new church policy

The Catholic church's new guidelines on child protection show "extraordinary arrogance" in defying the State's authority in looking…

The Catholic church's new guidelines on child protection show "extraordinary arrogance" in defying the State's authority in looking after vulnerable youngsters, a group representing survivors of abuse said today.

Colm O'Gorman, director of One in Four, said the new policy published in the wake of the Ferns Report was a rehash of the 1996 framework on child abuse, and showed nothing had changed within the Church.

And he criticised the failure to ensure that all allegations of abuse would automatically be reported to civil authorities.

The Our Children, Our Churchdocument lays out policies on how church officials are to work with children and the appropriate response to suspicions of abuse. Publishing the document, Archbishop Sean Brady said the church wanted children to feel they had been treated with the "dignity, respect and care" they deserve.

READ MORE

The board - which will be chaired by former Attorney General Mr Justice Anthony Hederman - will publish an annual audit on the implementation of the policy, and statistics on child abuse.

Mr O'Gorman criticised the decision to leave it up to the director of child protection to evaluate whether there were reasonable concerns of abuse and if it should be reported to civil authorities.

"What these guidelines tell us is not a jot has changed, that the Church believes it can - within a church context - manage child protection, when it so woefully failed to do so in the past, and that it will be the arbitrator of whether or not a concern exists," he said.

"The Catholic Church is usurping the authority of the state, it is subverting the ability of the state to protect children within a church context, when it decides that it will arbitrate whether or not a concern exists."

Mr O'Gorman said the Church had rehashed the 1996 guidelines and produced a version which didn't meet the standards demanded by the Ferns report or the terms of reference of the upcoming Dublin diocese inquiry.

"We've moved backwards not forwards," he said.

"At this stage in our history, does anybody seriously believe that it is appropriate to place the protection of children within the Church context in the gift of an organisation which has demonstrated a complete inability to deliver that protection and an unwillingness to implement its policies and procedures?" he said.

"I'm amazed, given the very strong indications from Government that they will act to ensure the recommendations of the Ferns Report - which go way above and beyond all of this, which require that even unreasonable suspicions should be reported to the civil authorities - that they have the extraordinary arrogance to publish guidelines that completely once again defy the state in terms of child protection," Mr O'Gorman told RTE radio.

The Irish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (ISPCC) welcomed the publication of the guidelines, but said policies which were not backed up with a statutory framework would not effectively protect children.

It called on the Government to support the Catholic church by implementing the Children Firstguidelines which were launched in 1999.

The children's charity also called for legislation on garda vetting of people who worked with youngsters and cross-border consistency in child protection.

PA