According to new research, “technoference” is real.
Toddlers who are exposed to more screen time have fewer conversations with their parents or caregivers by an array of measures. They say less, hear less and have fewer back-and-forth exchanges with adults compared with children who spend less time in front of screens.
Those findings, published recently in the journal JAMA Pediatrics, make up one of the first sets of longitudinal evidence to confirm an intuitive reality: screens are not just linked to higher rates of obesity, depression and hyperactivity among children; they also curb face-to-face interactions at home – with long-term implications that could be worrisome.
What interrupts household chatter?
Researchers have long known that growing up in a language-rich environment is vital for early language development. More language exposure early in life is associated with social development, higher IQs and even better brain function.
Majority of children on spinal waiting list will have surgery or date by end of year - Donnelly
‘We want to make cancer treatments less toxic for children with leukaemia’: A genomic boost to treat children’s cancer
Children’s surgery waiting times: Government’s frustration over delays ‘cannot be overstated’, Donnelly tells CHI chair
Given the value of such exposure, researchers in Australia were eager to investigate potential factors within the home environment that could be interrupting opportunities for parents to interact verbally with their children. Previous studies on the impact of technology mostly examined a parent’s use of a mobile device, rather than a child’s use of screens, and relied on self-reported measures of screen time rather than automated monitoring.
[ Higher screen time linked to delays in infant development, study findsOpens in new window ]
What researchers found
The new study, led by Mary Brushe, a researcher at the Telethon Kids Institute at the University of Western Australia, gathered data from 220 families across South Australia, Western Australia and Queensland with children who were born in 2017. Once every six months, until they turned three, the children wore T-shirts or vests that held small digital language processors that automatically tracked their exposure to certain types of electronic noise as well as language spoken by the child, the parent or another adult.
The researchers were particularly interested in three measures of language – words spoken by an adult, child vocalisations and turns in the conversation. They modelled each measure separately and adjusted the results for age, sex and other factors, such as the mother’s education level and the number of children at home.
Researchers found that at almost all ages, increased screen time squelched conversation. When the children were 18 months old, each additional minute of screen time was associated with 1.3 fewer child vocalisations, for example, and when they were two years old, an additional minute was associated with 0.4 fewer turns in conversation.
The strongest negative associations emerged when the children were three – and were exposed to an average of two hours 52 minutes of screen time daily. At this age, just one additional minute of screen time was associated with 6.6 fewer adult words, 4.9 fewer child vocalisations and 1.1 fewer turns in conversation.
What happens next
Lynn Perry, as associate professor of psychology at the University of Miami, who was not involved in the study, said she was impressed by the way the study employed an objective measuring tool to demonstrate associations that “had previously only been assumed”.
Dr Perry, who studies language and social interaction among preschool children, said experts in the field should next investigate how media designed to be viewed by parents and children together “might allow for more conversational turn-taking and bypass some of the negatives of screen time”.
Sarah Kucker, an expert in language development and digital media at Southern Methodist University in Dallas who was also not involved in the study, called the analysis “impressive”, but emphasised that understanding the nuances of how and when media is used in a larger and more diverse population is “a critical next step”.
“Media is not going away,” Kucker said, “but paying attention to how and when media is used may be a good future avenue.” – This article originally appeared in the New York Times
- Listen to our Inside Politics Podcast for the latest analysis and chat
- Sign up for push alerts and have the best news, analysis and comment delivered directly to your phone
- Find The Irish Times on WhatsApp and stay up to date
