A South African family was transferred from a hotel in Co Wicklow last month in circumstances where the State’s international protection accommodation system is facing “unprecedented pressure”, the High Court has been told.
David Conlan Smyth SC said the State parties will contest the asylum-seeking family’s proceedings, which allege a decision to transfer them to a hotel in Co Mayo came without proper warning, was “irrational” and breached their rights under the Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights.
Mr Conlan Smyth said Ireland is dealing with about five times the number of international protection applicants it would in a normal year.
The State has provided accommodation to 40,000 Ukrainian refugees, a cohort not represented at all in international protection figures prior to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, he added.
Gerry Thornley: Ireland’s fitful displays made for a rather disconcerting month
Nil Yalter: Solo Exhibition – A fascinating glimpse of a historically influential artist
Katie McCabe and Ireland fully focused on their qualification goal ahead of Wales match
A Californian woman in Dublin: ‘Ireland’s not perfect, but I do think as a whole it is moving in the right direction’
Mr Conlan Smyth said there is “simply nothing available” to accommodate the family in Co Wicklow. “If the family was to be moved back to Wicklow, another family would be dislodged.”
The court heard that an education welfare officer is making contact with schools in an attempt to secure places in Co Mayo for the children in the family, but there has been some delay in these efforts as schools are on holiday.
‘Extreme violence’
In a sworn statement, the mother said her family sought protection in Ireland in July due to “extreme violence” being levelled against them in their home country and ineffective state protection there.
She said they settled into life in Co Wicklow, with the children making friends at schools and sporting clubs.
On October 13th, the family was “shocked” to receive a letter from the International Protection Accommodation Services (IPAS), notifying them that they would transfer to “more suitable accommodation”. The woman said they were given two days’ warning before they were transported on October 19th to a roofless cubicle in the gymnasium of a Co Mayo hotel.
Earlier this week, Mr Justice Brian O’Moore gave the family permission to give short notice to the State parties of a motion seeking a temporary injunction that would compel the State to return them to their previous accommodation. Alternatively, the family wanted an order requiring the State to carry out “such action as is necessary and appropriate” to ensure the children can continue to attend their schools in Wicklow.
‘Lack of urgency’
The family’s counsel, Tony McGillicuddy SC, with Harriet Burgess BL, said the State’s reference to school holidays showed its “lack of urgency” in dealing with the matter. The family gave plenty of notice, he said, as they tried to address their concerns through correspondence prior to coming to court.
Mr Justice O’Moore scheduled a hearing of the family’s application, seeking injunctions to last until the main trial of the case, for November 15th.
Their case is against the Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, the Minister for Justice, the Minister for Education, Ireland, and the Attorney General.
