Convicted rapist fails in bid to halt deportation from State

The High Court has refused to grant a convicted rapist a last minute injunction that would have prevented his deportation from the State.

Mr Justice Max Barrett ruled that the man, a non-EU national who cannot be named for legal reasons, had not made out an arguable case that would allow the court to make an order restraining the Minister of Justice from removing him from Ireland on a flight on Friday afternoon.

The court heard that the man was found guilty of raping and assaulting a woman in late August 2015. He was found guilty by a jury at the Central Criminal Court in 2019 and given a five-year prison sentence, with the final two years suspended.

The Minister for Justice subsequently made an order for his removal from the State.

Diarmaid Ferriter: We hardly need reminders of how little the Tories think of Ireland

---

Northampton’s rise to the last four: Bulking up, defensive steel and attacking prowess

---

Your top stories on Friday: Asylum seekers pitch tents in Ballsbridge; united Ireland costs would ‘equal austerity’

---

Stephen Collins: When Harris chickened out of moving McEntee, he lost the chance for a new approach to immigration

---

The man, who is aged in his 40s and whose wife and family reside in Ireland, had been living in the country for several years. However his visa had expired and he had no permission to legally stay in Ireland.

In judicial review proceedings, the man sought to halt his proposed deportation on the grounds that he had applied for permission to remain in the State under the Undocumented Migrant Scheme. The scheme was set up by the Minister for Justice to regularise undocumented persons that have been living in Ireland for some time.

The man had made an application while serving his sentence in the Midlands Prison.

However, his application, he claimed, had not yet been processed and he was seeking an order halting his deportation and that he be allowed remain in the State until a decision has been finalised.

Lawyers for the State opposed the application and argued that his deportation should be allowed proceed.

It was claimed that the man’s application could proceed with him being outside of Ireland.

While no decision has been made in his case, the court was told that one of the criteria to be considered was that any applicant must be of good character.

Given the nature and seriousness of the man’s conviction, the State submitted that at the very least he faced an “uphill challenge” to be granted permission under the scheme to remain in Ireland.

In his ruling, Mr Justice Barrett said that he had to take into account the nature of the man’s crimes and the fact that the man could maintain his application under the scheme even if he is removed from the country.

The court was not satisfied that in the circumstances that the main had made out a fair argument that would allow the court to grant the injunction.

The court was therefore dismissing the injunction application clearing the way for his deportation.