Landlord jailed after harassing former tenant ‘to breaking point’

A landlord who harassed his former tenant “to breaking point” after their tenancy agreement ended on poor terms has been sentenced to two years in jail with the final 16 months suspended.

Thomas Armstrong (46) of Addison Avenue, Glasnevin, Dublin, pleaded guilty at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court to harassment of Lorna McAuley on dates between August 2016 and August 2018.

The court heard that a dispute arose when Armstrong said he wanted to move back into the apartment and claimed Ms McAuley owed him for rent and damage. He then began “a campaign of intimidation and terror” against her.

Passing sentence on Thursday, Judge Melanie Greally said the calculated and long nature of the offending in multiple forms represented an “extreme violation” of Ms McAuley’s privacy and peace of mind.

Helping stressed-out GPs manage staffing issues in the workplace

---

Karlin Lillington: Google somewhat two-faced on workplace politics

---

Laura Kennedy: It’s hard to put my finger on what’s different about the atmosphere in this gym

---

Gordon D'Arcy: Sexton’s leadership vacuum will be felt as Leinster can’t replicate the emotion of La Rochelle match

---

Garda Darren Farrell told Monika Leech, prosecuting, that the harassment took three forms, including anonymous complaints to Dublin City Council in relation to Ms McAuley’s parents’ roof garden.

Armstrong, a Mayo native, also created a Twitter account in Ms McAuley’s name on which he posted photos of her and bogus tweets, and lastly that he advertised tickets for the 2016 All Ireland final on DoneDeal, listing Ms McAuley’s phone number.

The judge said further aggravating factors of Armstrong’s “campaign of harassment” included his “dishonest” communications with Dublin City Council and the anguish he caused Ms McAuley by involving her elderly parents in his intimidation.

The judge set a headline sentence of 40 months, but gave Armstrong credit for his guilty plea, his absence of previous or subsequent convictions, his expressions of remorse, his low risk of reoffending and the numerous excellent character references speaking highly of his personal qualities.

The court heard Armstrong brought the sum of €4,000 to court as a gesture of remorse to help defray Ms Mc Auley’s medical and legal costs, but that she refused to accept this.

The judge directed that the money be given to Pieta House and agreed to allow Armstrong 10 days before taking up his sentence to get his affairs in order. He is due to present himself at Store Street Garda station on June 15th to begin his eight-month jail sentence.

Armstrong was ordered not to communicate with Ms McAuley by any means for 40 years or to approach within 500m of her home or place of work.

Ms McAuley took the stand to read her own victim-impact statement earlier this week. She said would “never in her wildest dreams” have thought of herself as a victim before this ordeal, which she said had brought her “to breaking point”.

She said she would never forgive Armstrong and that his behaviour had caused her “shame, stress, anxiety, terror and hurt,” destroyed her peace of mind, and impacted on her physical and mental health. “I rue the day we rented a house from him,” she continued.

She explained that a dispute arose when Armstrong said he wanted to move back into the apartment and claimed she owed him for rent and damage. She said what followed from him was “a campaign of intimidation and terror” and that she was inundated with calls and text messages.

Ms McAuley said Armstrong posted photos of her on the fake Twitter account he set up in her name and identified where she lived and worked.

“He attempted to destroy my reputation by posting outlandish remarks. I felt violated and I am quite a private person,” Ms McAuley said.

“The Twitter account was only deleted this April and I only became aware of it when he emailed me a link to it from a bogus account.”

She said she suffers from chronic pain and distress and her sleep was severely impacted. “It took a toll on my mental health. I had to get counselling. I have never in my entire life felt more vulnerable or intimidated than when I was under attack from Mr Armstrong.”

Rebecca Smith, defending, said her client had written a letter of apology. “If he could take back what he did, he would. There was a disagreement as to how the dispute arose – it initially arose from a rental dispute,” Ms Smith said.

She added that while that did not excuse his behaviour, he also had an alcohol problem at the time which he has since dealt with.

The judge said she found it hard to accept the defence application that Armstrong was suffering from alcoholism at this time. “I don’t believe that someone suffering from alcoholism could conduct this kind of coherent campaign and hold down a highly responsible job,” said the judge.

“I don’t believe for a second that a man of his education didn’t fully realise the implication of his actions.”