Relief for Macron as top French court scraps large parts of new immigration Bill

Most of the clauses thrown out by the constitutional council for procedural reasons had been introduced by opposition right-wing politicians

Large parts of a new French immigration law, including restrictions on access to welfare benefits for migrants and to citizenship for their children born in France, must be scrapped, the constitutional council said on Thursday.

The court, which determines whether laws are constitutional, struck down 35 of the 80 measures contained in the Bill. Most of the scrapped clauses were introduced by opposition right-wing politicians during a turbulent parliamentary process.

Measures, including making it harder for migrants to bring in relatives to live with them in France, for birth in France to lead to citizenship and to get access to state welfare, were scrapped for procedural reasons.

The ruling offers some relief to president Emmanuel Macron, who had made the Bill a key plank of his second term.


Mr Macron, who lacks a working majority in parliament, was embarrassed by the support it drew from Marine Le Pen’s far-right National Rally party as conservative politicians hardened its content.

Along with three other groups, Mr Macron had referred the legislation to the council.

Interior minister Gérald Darmanin welcomed the ruling, saying it validated the government’s initial proposals.

“Never has a Bill included more measures to expel delinquents or introduced stricter requirements for the integration of foreigners,” Mr Darmanin added.

Gathered some hundred metres away from the courthouse, a group of people opposed to the Bill said they were still concerned, despite the changes.

“We are a bit relieved but we remained worried – in the initial text there was lots of bad stuff,” said Virgile Vaugelade, a schoolteacher in a Paris suburb, adding he expected the rejected measures would be added at another time.

Of the measures the court annulled, 32 were purely on procedural grounds. The court did not say whether the content of those clauses breached the constitution, meaning they could be introduced in a future Bill.

Public law professor Serge Slama said that the ruling works in the government’s favour while changing very little for migrant rights, since the articles proposed by the right-wing politicians were rejected on procedural grounds, not on their content.

“They said as little as they could, while fulfilling their role to make sure procedure is respected,” said Mr Slama, professor at Université Grenoble Alpes, adding that this is commonplace in constitutional council decisions.

Far-right opposition leader Jordan Bardella criticised the judges.

“With the support of the president of the republic himself, the constitutional council has censured the tough measures most approved by the French people,” he said on X.

– Reuters