Sir, - In the light of the new IRA ceasefire, I feel I must urge a more positive view of the future of the Seanad than has been apparent in the recent article by Vincent Browne and subsequent correspondence. Compared with the archaic privilege of the House of
Lords at Westminster, there is an opportunity for a wide cross-section of opinion to be heard in the Seanad, beyond the traditional party politics.
This basic strength as a balance to the Dail means that the Seanad could have a vital role in future North/South relations, especially if more Northerners are able to participate in its affairs. It could be a catalytic agent enabling a substantive exchange of ideas with the imminent Assembly in the North on issues of serious mutual concern.
May I cite one example? It would be highly positive if a Seanad sub-committee on juvenile justice and child protection could produce ultimately a discussion document with the respective committee of the Assembly which paved the way for new policy and legislation in both parts of the island. As for the University seats, there is clearly scepticism about their value. I would argue that, far from being a privilege, we are entering an era of mass tertiary education, and it would be an excellent means of involving fully emerging intelligent young people in contributing to the betterment of their society if the constituency for the existing six seats was broadened to incorporate all universities, regional technical colleges and colleges of further education. Clearly, there is also an argument to extend the franchise to minority groups and to encourage more participation by women. In addition, if the Seanad were given more extensive powers in relation to the delaying of Bills and appointments to key public positions, this would also help to restore its credibility in the public view. The current bi-cameral system has far more strengths than weaknesses, and should be enhanced, not dismantled. - Yours, etc., Dr BRIAN CAUL,
Coleraine,
Co Derry.