The minister with responsibility for housing policy and delivery, Darragh O’Brien, has been rightly criticised for his dismissal of one of the most important recommendations of the Housing Commission’s report, namely the establishment of a Housing Delivery Oversight Executive (HDOE). That body would, for a limited period, mobilise and oversee what Ireland needs so badly – an emergency five-to-seven year programme for delivering new housing.
Mr O’Brien indicated his opposition to the HDOE by describing the proposal as problematic and one which he disagreed with on “first examination”.
The provision of a hugely increased housing supply is vital to Ireland’s social and economic wellbeing. With an expanding population and major constraints on the supply of affordable homes, Ireland is facing a crisis of its own making.
The term “problematic” is far more aptly applied to the Minister’s own department. A succession of ministers in the Department of Housing have failed utterly to appreciate that the department itself is the problem.
Having a million EVs by 2030 is an illusion - we cannot even meet existing electricity demand
Sinn Féin’s housing policy
Sinn Féin’s leaders are not really leaders. They’re more like glove puppets for unseen controllers
An intervention from Germany’s opposition could prove important to the EU’s approach to migration
In 2009, minister John Gormley, at the behest of Threshold, a housing charity, made a regulation that effectively banned the letting of bed-sits from 2013 onwards. The idea was that nobody should be obliged to share a bathroom or kitchen facility with any other tenant in a building.
And so, over the course of four years, bedsits were abolished, removing the bottom rung of the housing market ladder for students, young home-leavers, single people and many others. Perhaps between 10,000 and 20,000 such dwellings were abolished in the city of Dublin.
There were many substandard bedsits; but the total abolition of bedsits was unfair, unwise and ill thought-out, even if naively well intentioned.
The ludicrous aspect was that house-sharing and apartment-sharing that involved shared bathrooms and kitchens were still available for those with the money.
Equally extraordinary was the decision by the same department to promote new “shared living” developments for students and young people just a few years after killing off bedsits. Did no one see the absurdity of the U-turn involved in those policy initiatives?
Then, the same department turned what passes for its mind to the private rented dwellings market. They apparently forgot the disaster that rent control in the form of the Rent Restrictions Acts had been for the nearly half of the 20th century. They effectively froze the private rented dwellings market, introducing a period where lessors were effectively dispossessed by an unconstitutional statutory regime of rent freeze and eviction bans. Ignoring this history, the department started to freeze rents and make repossessions almost impossible for many private lessors (I prefer the term “lessor” to “landlord”, a pejorative term in Irish minds).
All tenancies were converted into tenancies of “indefinite duration” accompanied by prohibition on termination except on a few very narrow and restrictive grounds. Coupled with Rent Pressure Zones measures, the law was tilted massively against private lessors. They began to leave the market.
And when Sinn Féin briefly looked like being the largest party in the next government and promised to prevent lessors from recovering possession of rented homes to offer them for sale with vacant possession, the exodus of lessors from the private rented market became obvious to all.
Some people naively state that lessors leaving the private rental market means that the houses will become available for purchase and the market for homes to buy will improve. Theoretically that is true. But there will always be a private rented dwellings demand by people who are not in a position to buy their homes.
The department also introduced and rapidly abandoned its “strategic housing development” route of applying for planning permission for major housing projects.
What is needed now is a massive, sustained increase in home building. That, in turn, demands a massive mobilisation of the relevant resources in terms of land supply, the construction industry, servicing and related infrastructure, planning permissions, zoning, building standards and urban site assembly.
We have got to be prepared to use reformed and much simplified compulsory purchase powers to deliver supply.
One department, the housing department, has shown that it simply lacks the understanding or motivation to deal with the housing problem. It has consistently stifled local authorities as providers of land and development projects for social and affordable housing. It designed and introduced the Office of Planning Regulator system to enforce restrictive controls on housing development across Ireland.
That system has actually led to de-zoning of development lands in places such as Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown. Local authority members are now strictly controlled in their powers to decide on county and city development plans.
Mr O’Brien needs to ask himself just why the department he heads, and the system of local government that he oversees, and the State agencies under his supervision, have failed successive ministers of all parties for so long.
The Housing Commission did not propose a new quango as an optional extra – it is vital that the HDOE is established now.