Politics

British diplomats in US lobbied against fair employment campaign

Northern state papers 1987: officials claimed approval of MacBride Principles would deter investment and require ‘preferential treatment of one community over the other’

Seán MacBride in 1987: associated with movement for fair employment. Photograph: Paddy Whelan
Seán MacBride in 1987: associated with movement for fair employment. Photograph: Paddy Whelan
Fri Aug 21 2015 - 01:00

British concern at the growing success of the Irish-American campaign to persuade US state legislatures to adopt the MacBride Principles on fair employment in Northern Ireland is charted in confidential 1987 files released today in Belfast.

The MacBride Principles were linked to the former Irish minister, jurist and Nobel Prize winner Seán MacBride, who had promoted them at the New York state legislature.

The principles included increasing the representation of individuals from under-represented religious groups in the workforce, the banning of provocative religious or political emblems from the workplace and the establishment of procedures to assess, identify and recruit minority employees with potential for advancement.

In May 1987, representatives of Irish-American organisations, led by John C Dearie, met with New York comptroller Edmund Regan to discuss incorporating the MacBride Principles in the New York state pension funds of US companies doing business in Northern Ireland.

READ MORE

A month later, on June 10th, 1987, James Mellon, director of trade and investment at the British consulate in New York, wrote to Philadelphia mayor Wilson Goode to protest against the city council's vote to pass a Bill endorsing "MacBride".

Mellon said the Bill threatened “to divert all monies and funds from companies who do not subscribe to the MacBride Principles”. He said the principles were unnecessary as the British government had taken effective steps to establish the principle of fair employment in the North. Secondly, “the MacBride Principles, which seem to require preferential treatment for one community over the other, go beyond the principles of equality of opportunity enshrined in NI employment law.”

The Philadelphia Bill, he told the mayor, would result in disinvestment in Northern Ireland. It was especially disappointing that “Philadelphia, the home of the US constitution” should have taken this course.

Writing to Northern Ireland Office officials on June 23rd, 1987, Stephen J Leach said secretary of state Tom King was due to meet Mellon in London to discuss the MacBride campaign in the US. Andrew Henderson, a diplomat, had been appointed exclusively "to lobby against MacBride at the New York consulate", he wrote.

Leach informed King that of the four states in the New York district, MacBride legislation was operating in Connecticut and New York. In New Jersey the Bill had been passed, awaiting only the signature of the governor. This left Pennsylvania.

Elsewhere, there was a move to introduce a Bill in Congress and the House of Representatives, as well as similar “MacBride Bills” in states including California, Illinois and Florida.

At his London meeting with the Northern secretary on June 25th, 1987, the consul was pessimistic about British efforts to counter the campaign. “The MacBride campaign was proving more damaging than the American perception of violence; he felt we had largely won the media battle in relation to our political approach . . . But there remained a real risk that, if we could not ‘calm down’ the situation, there would be far less American investment in NI in five or 10 years’ time.”