A leading Australian breast cancer surgeon claims many media reports that the Australian supermodel Elle Macpherson treated breast cancer with alternative therapies have left out crucial information, risking people being misinformed.
News organisations reported that after Macpherson was diagnosed with HER2 positive oestrogen receptive intraductal carcinoma in 2017, she decided not to follow standard medical advice from doctors.
She told the Australian Women’s Weekly magazine that she instead followed “an intuitive, heart-led, holistic approach” and rejected surgery, chemotherapy and radiation.
But Macpherson says she did undergo a lumpectomy, which is a type of surgery that involves removing a breast lump.
Michael Smurfit: Succession review - A soft-spoken and thoughtful multi-millionaire with a killer instinct
Lauryn Hill and the Fugees in Dublin review: Everything fans hoped for in a great show combining soul and power
Being English in Ireland, I often sense I’m being too frank
Anna Geary: ‘Losing a sibling is not talked about a lot. They are meant to be there with you when your parents aren’t’
In itself, a lumpectomy may in some cases be an appropriate, standard medical treatment for the condition, says Prof Chris Pyke, the director of medical services at the Mater private hospitals in Brisbane.
Prof Pyke, a cancer surgeon and breast cancer risk quantification expert, says HER2 positive oestrogen receptive intraductal carcinoma in many cases could more accurately be described as a type of non-invasive precancer that has the potential to become aggressive if left untreated.
“Intraductal means precancerous, so the cancer cells have formed but they are still housed inside the ducts in the breast,” Prof Pyke says.
“Left to its own devices, a certain proportion of these cases will turn into invasive cancer during the next year. But the number is not high – about 5 per cent. It’s quite possible that just removing that lump all by itself could have been sufficient treatment.”
Media reports, which are based on the Women’s Weekly’s exclusive interview with Macpherson about the launch of her new book, lack detail about the size of the precancer or the grade of the cells, or other risk factors Macpherson may or may not have had.
[ When is a cancer not a cancer?Opens in new window ]
The Guardian has asked the publisher of her book, Penguin Random House, and the Women’s Weekly, if those details were asked for or provided, or if they have specific details about her treatments, both conventional and alternative.
“On top of just removing it, for this particular type of disease, sometimes radiotherapy is added and we can help guide patients on that depending on how big the area of precancerous change was, what the grade of the cells were, and sometimes there’s gene expression profiling that can be added on top of that to help make decisions and inform risk,” Prof Pyke says.
It is unclear if Macpherson underwent gene expression profiling.
Prof Pyke says about one-third of patients will have a mastectomy recommended at initial diagnosis, “not because it is severe” but because more than one-quarter of the breast is affected. Removing enough tissue with a lumpectomy alone in these cases could significantly distort the breast, so mastectomy and reconstruction may be offered.
It is also unclear whether Macpherson was diagnosed because she felt a lump, or because she underwent screening and the condition was detected through imaging, which may also make a difference to treatment recommendations and how important radiation, chemotherapy and mastectomy may be.
“The biggest thing for breast cancer, until we find the cause, is that early diagnosis is the most important thing,” Prof Pyke says. “If you find breast cancer, even invasive cancer, early before you can feel it, there’s very little chance it’s going to shorten your life.”
The public and patients alike really need to be wary of celebrities, and increasingly social media influencers, who discuss this kind of wellness or alternative therapy approach
He says for patients with the earliest forms of breast cancer, they “need to be offered every treatment option that has the same outcome”. That means if a patient has intraductal carcinoma, “they may have been offered lumpectomy by itself; lumpectomy and radiotherapy; or mastectomy as well”, Prof Pyke says.
For early detected disease, “those three things have the same outcome, as far as preventing that type of precancer spreading anywhere”.
All options are offered because some patients may prefer a mastectomy over a lumpectomy due to fear of recurrence. While lumpectomy followed by radiation offers similar long-term survival rates to mastectomy, there is a slightly higher risk of recurrence with lumpectomy alone.
There are also drugs, including immune-modulation drugs, that may be tried, and Prof Pyke says it is important for patients to be part of these treatment decisions. Someone who chooses more conservative treatment like lumpectomy alone might then be screened more regularly to monitor for any recurrence or spread, he says.
With growing concerns about overdiagnosis and overtreatment of some forms of non-aggressive breast cancers and precancers, some experts advocate for a more conservative treatment before undergoing surgery, with lots of monitoring and support from healthcare providers, Prof Pyke says, emphasising that it is okay for patients to ask questions about their treatment.
“The truth is, most people with a cancer diagnosis will do something on top of what we (medical doctors) recommend,” he says.
“Almost everyone does meditation, or takes a vitamin, and I say if it won’t interfere with the treatment, do it. And the second thing I say is that the only things which have been proven to treat cancer are surgery, radiation, chemotherapy and hormone treatments.”
Vicki Durston, the director of policy, advocacy and support services at Breast Cancer Network Australia, says providing the correct, full context to Macpherson’s treatment and her decisions “are so important to get the messaging right to alleviate fears and cut through the noise”.
She says media reports “are confusing for people that are currently in treatment” and some were now starting to question their own choices and approach.
“It’s important that when high-profile figures like Elle Macpherson share their story, they need to understand that their story has enormous impact and reach,” Durston says.
Dr Brooke Nickel, a National Health and Medical Research Council emerging leader research fellow with the University of Sydney who has researched media reporting of healthcare, including cancer, says Macpherson also owns a wellness company, and patients should factor that in when considering her comments while also consulting doctors.
Speaking generally, Nickel adds: “The public and patients alike really need to be wary of celebrities, and increasingly social media influencers, who discuss this kind of wellness or alternative therapy approach, and who may be profiting from associations with brands and products.
“This wellness movement often aligns itself with the women’s health movement, which is about autonomy, empowerment and legitimate criticisms of patriarchal medical systems. This whole rise with celebrities and influencers adopting the women’s empowerment language has taken the wellness movement to the next level, and often, what they’re discussing is not based on evidence.” – Guardian